The optical Bloch equations can be generalized to describe not just an
atom interacting with the vacuum, but also an atom and a single cavity
mode, each interacting with its own reservoir. This is the master
equation for cavity QED, and using such a master equation we can
revisit the phenomenon of vacuum Rabi oscillations and see what
happens in the presence of damping.
Generalization of the optical Bloch equations
The starting point for generalizing the optical Bloch equations is the
Lindblad form we previously saw in the
full-derivation walkthrough,
In this expression, and are "jump operators,"
and represent changes that occur to the atom when distinct dissipative
events happen ("distinct" meaning that the environment changes
between orthogonal states).
We may write the master equation for our more general scenario by
replacing the atomic density matrix by a general density
matrix representing the atom and cavity field, and by replacing
the atomic jump operators with general jump operators ,
Note that the include normalization factors which reflect their
probabilities of occurrence. In other words, for the atom + vacuum
model, .
Master equation for cavity QED system
For the cavity QED model, the atom and cavity field each have possible
jump operators. In general, the atom and cavity may both couple to a
thermal field with average photons. In such a case, the jump
operators are , , , and
, where parameterizes the
spontaneous emission rate of the atom in free space, and is
parameterizes the cavity factor.
Experimentally, typically the
environment, the vacuum, is essentially at zero temperature, so
, in which case the only two relevant jump operators are
and .
Damped vacuum Rabi oscillations
Vacuum Rabi oscillations, in the absence of damping, involve only two
states of the atom and cavity: and . When damping is
added, the state must be included, since both the atom and
cavity states can decay and loose their quanta of energy. Moreover,
because only one quantum of excitation is involved in this system, we
can observe the essential physics by considering the case when
is zero (no spontaneous emission), but is nonzero
(the cavity is leaky). Let be the vacuum Rabi frequency,
and denote this three state space by , , and
. Written out explicitly in terms of the
density matrix elements , the master equation is (for the case with the atom starting
in the ground state)
When the cavity damping rate is small, , then the
vacuum Rabi oscillations are damped, with average damping rate
since the atoms spend roughly half their time in the excited state.
When the cavity damping rate is large, , then the
atomic excitation is irreversibly damped, and no oscillations occur.
Let be the probability of being in the state. We can combine two of the above equations to write
Since in this case , and
, it follows that
Since in this regime, we slowly try to populate state while it quickly decays away, we can approximate giving
Finally plugging this back into the optical bloch equation for yields
so decays exponentially, with rate .
Note that a large cavity damping rate slows down the decay of the atom's excited state. This is due to the fact that the stimulated transition (Rabi oscillation) to the lower state is slowed down by the cavity damping (which is a manifestation of the quantum Zeno effect).
Purcell factor: cavity enhanced spontaneous emission
How does this compare with the free space spontaneous emission rate
? Recall that the vacuum Rabi frequency is
where is the atomic dipole moment and is the electric field
amplitude of a single photon at the atomic transition frequency
,
and is the cavity volume. This gives
Letting , we thus find that
as the decay rate of the atom in the cavity.
Recall that the spontaneous emission rate of an atom in free space, as
determined by Fermi's golden rule, is
The ratio of this rate to the decay rate in the cavity is
where we take as being the wavelength of
the cavity field, which is assumed to be resonant with the atomic
transition frequency . Note that is independent of the atomic dipole strength, and determined solely by
cavity parameters. Moreover, note that for small, high- cavities, the decay rate of the atom in the
cavity can be much larger than the free space spontaneous emission
rate. This "cavity enhanced" spontaneous emission rate was predicted
by Purcell (1946), an observation credited as being the starting point
of cavity QED.