Difference between revisions of "Weakly Interacting Homogeneous Bose Gas"
imported>Zakven (→Weakly Interacting Bose Gas at T=0: Continuing to edit the Weakly Interacting Bose Gas subsection) |
imported>Zakven (→Weakly Interacting Bose Gas near T=0: Finished Weakly Interacting Bose Gas section) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The full hamiltonian is simply this plus the kinetic energy term | The full hamiltonian is simply this plus the kinetic energy term | ||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
− | + | H | |
\approx \frac{U_0 N_0^2}{2V} + \sum_k \epsilon_k a^\dagger_k a_k + \frac{U_0 N_0}{2V} \sum_{k \neq 0} a^\dagger_{k} a^\dagger_{-k} + a_k a_{-k} + 2 a^\dagger_k a_k + a^\dagger_{-k} a_{-k} | \approx \frac{U_0 N_0^2}{2V} + \sum_k \epsilon_k a^\dagger_k a_k + \frac{U_0 N_0}{2V} \sum_{k \neq 0} a^\dagger_{k} a^\dagger_{-k} + a_k a_{-k} + 2 a^\dagger_k a_k + a^\dagger_{-k} a_{-k} | ||
\,. | \,. | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
to give | to give | ||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
− | + | H | |
\approx \frac{U_0 N^2}{2V} + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k \neq 0} \left(\epsilon_k +\frac{N U_0}{V} \right) \left(a^\dagger_k a_k + a^\dagger_{-k} a_{-k}\right) + \frac{N U_0}{V} \left(a^\dagger_{k} a^\dagger_{-k} + a_k a_{-k} \right) | \approx \frac{U_0 N^2}{2V} + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k \neq 0} \left(\epsilon_k +\frac{N U_0}{V} \right) \left(a^\dagger_k a_k + a^\dagger_{-k} a_{-k}\right) + \frac{N U_0}{V} \left(a^\dagger_{k} a^\dagger_{-k} + a_k a_{-k} \right) | ||
\,. | \,. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
+ | Each term in the sum has the form | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | H_k | ||
+ | =E_{0,k} \left(a^\dagger a + b^\dagger b\right) +E_{1}\left(a^\dagger b^\dagger + a b \right) | ||
+ | \,. | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | where we've define <math>E_{0,k}= \left(\epsilon_k +\frac{N U_0}{V} \right) </math>, <math>E_{1}= \frac{N U_0}{V} </math>, <math>a=a_k</math> and <math>b=a_{-k}</math>. Now the first term in <math>H_k</math> looks nice, it's just the hamiltonian for harmonic oscillators. The second term however is inconvenient, so we'd like to get rid of it. This can be done by performing the Bogoliubov transformations, which rewrites the hamiltonian in terms of different operators <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math>, which are superpositions of <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>. In particular we write | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | a=u\alpha -v\beta^\dagger \\ | ||
+ | b=u\beta -v\alpha^\dagger | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | where we have the freedom to choose <math>u</math> and <math>v</math>. The first requirement we impose is to make sure <math>[\alpha,\alpha^\dagger] = [\beta,\beta^\dagger] = 1</math> so that <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> obey the bosonic commutation relations. This forces <math>u^2-v^2=1</math>, but still leaves one degree of freedom. When plugging <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> into <math>H_k</math>, we see we'll get something of the form | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | H_k | ||
+ | = (\ldots) \left(\alpha^\dagger \alpha + \beta^\dagger \beta \right) + (\ldots) \left( \alpha^\dagger \beta^\dagger + \alpha \beta \right) | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | Therefore, we use our other degree of freedom to choose <math>u</math> and <math>v</math> such that the second prefactor is zero, thereby getting rid of the troublesome terms. We are just left with | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | H_k | ||
+ | =(\ldots) \left(\alpha^\dagger \alpha + \beta^\dagger \beta \right) | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | for which we know the solutions are just the harmonic oscillator eigenstates. | ||
=== Sound propagation in Bose-Einstein condensates === | === Sound propagation in Bose-Einstein condensates === |
Revision as of 09:04, 7 May 2017
Typical introductory statistical mechanics courses examine BECs by assuming that they consist of many non-interacting atoms. That simple model does an excellent job of predicting the condensation temperature and fraction of atoms in the condensate, however it quantitatively and even qualitatively misses some of the properties of real BECs. The issue is that real atoms interact with each other and these interactions can alter many properties of a BEC. Fortunately, a simple mean-field treatment of the interactions can create an excellent model that captures much of the behavior seen in real BECs as will be shown in the following sections.
Weakly Interacting Bose Gas near
We can start to account for atom-atom interactions by adding a collisional term to the hamiltonian. We can consider a collision as a process that annihilates a particle with momentum and a particle with momentum , then creates two particles with momenta and . By momentum conservation we may write and . We let be the matrix element for this process, and so we can write collisional hamiltonian as the sum of all possible collisions (with a factor of 2 to avoid double-counting input states)
This hamiltonian is far too complicated to solve in the general case, so we must make some approximations. First, for typical BEC parameters, the spacing between atoms is much larger than the collisional scattering length of the atoms. Therefore the complicated atomic interaction potential can be well approximated by replacing it with a delta function potential. In particular, if the atomic separation is , then we may write the potential as where and is the -wave scattering length. Now is the Fourier transform of , and since the Fourier transform of a delta function is a constant function, we have that . So we may write
Unfortunately this Hamiltonian is still too complicated to solve. The reason is that it is extremely difficult to diagonalize hamiltonians that are a product of four operators. Therefore we need some way to simplify things down to two operators. We do this with the Bogoliubov approximation, which says that when there are a large number of atoms in the condenstate, we may approximate . And since and , we may then approximate those operators with c-numbers . Furthermore, since is large, we see that the terms in the hamiltonian that will dominate are the ones in which there are two or more occurrences of and/or . We may therefore approximate the hamiltonian as
The full hamiltonian is simply this plus the kinetic energy term
At this point we have made enough approximations to arrive at a solvable hamiltonian, since it only involves quadratic products of operators.
To show that it is possible to diagonalize this hamiltonian, we will outline the method. We start by replacing with using the relation
to give
Each term in the sum has the form
where we've define , , and . Now the first term in looks nice, it's just the hamiltonian for harmonic oscillators. The second term however is inconvenient, so we'd like to get rid of it. This can be done by performing the Bogoliubov transformations, which rewrites the hamiltonian in terms of different operators and , which are superpositions of and . In particular we write
- Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle a=u\alpha -v\beta^\dagger \\ b=u\beta -v\alpha^\dagger }
where we have the freedom to choose and . The first requirement we impose is to make sure so that and obey the bosonic commutation relations. This forces , but still leaves one degree of freedom. When plugging and into , we see we'll get something of the form
Therefore, we use our other degree of freedom to choose and such that the second prefactor is zero, thereby getting rid of the troublesome terms. We are just left with
for which we know the solutions are just the harmonic oscillator eigenstates.
Sound propagation in Bose-Einstein condensates
We've seen two general cooling methods so far: Doppler cooling and, on trapped ions, sideband cooling. Last time: Bogolubov transform to diagonalize interacting Bose Einstein condensate.
This dispersion relation shows us that the low lying excitaitons are phonons. At , that of sound, while at , , a free particle. Free particles start with a quadratic dispersion relation, while phonons and other Bose systems start with a linear dispersion relation.
The Bogolubov solution has a great deal of physics in it. It gives the elementary excitation, and the ground state energy. In the simple model that we have a mean field, the ground state energy is
The extra correction term on the right is a small term, recently observed by the Innsbruck group, due to collective effects. The Bogolubov solution also gives the ground state wavefunction,
where is the quantum depletion term, which makes the wavefunction satisfy
and
The quantum depletion term, which arises from the fact that the gas is weakly interacting, has now been experimentally observed. Recall that in the Bogolubov approximation, the original interaction
is approximated by
The quantum depletion this leads to is very small. The effect can be more readily experimentally observed by increasing the mass of the particle, and this can be done by placing the particles in a lattice. Plotting the quantum depletion which can be obtained as a function of lattice depth, in such an experiment, one gets:
Beyond a quantum depletion fraction of , the Bogolubov approximation breaks down, as the condensate goes through a superfluid to Mott-insulator transition.
Back to: Quantum gases