Difference between revisions of "Ideal Fermi Gas"
imported>Junruli |
imported>Junruli |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas. | + | We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas. In this section we simply our situation to the spin-polarized fermi gasses (single component). Unlike bosons, due to the Pauli exclusion principle, the lowest <math>s-wave</math> interaction is suppressed in the single-component Fermi gasses. Therefore degenerate fermi gasses eventually provided a better ideal gas system. |
− | == Fermi-Dirac distribution == | + | === Fermi-Dirac distribution === |
The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number <math>N</math> and total energy content <math>E_{\rm tot}</math> of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble). | The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number <math>N</math> and total energy content <math>E_{\rm tot}</math> of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble). | ||
For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies <math>\epsilon_i</math>, the average occupation of state <math>i</math> is | For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies <math>\epsilon_i</math>, the average occupation of state <math>i</math> is | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
\,. | \,. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
− | These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles <math>N</math> one chooses the chemical potential <math>\mu</math> such that <math>N | + | These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles <math>N</math> one chooses the chemical potential <math>\mu</math> such that <math>N=\sum_i f(\epsilon_i, \mu, T)</math>. |
− | \sum_i f(\epsilon_i, \mu, T)</math>. | + | === Fermi Energy === |
− | == Fermi Energy == | + | A very direct consequence of the Fermi - Dirac distribution is the existence of Fermi energy <math>E_F</math>, defined as the energy of the highest occupied state of the non-interacting Fermi gas at <math>T=0</math>. In this case, the FD distribution takes the simple form, we have the simplified Fermi-Dirac distribution |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
− | + | f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ | |
− | \ | + | \begin{array}{ll} |
− | \ | + | 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) < \mu$} \\ |
+ | 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) > \mu$} \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
+ | The (globally) largest momentum is <math>p_F \equiv \hbar k_F \equiv \sqrt{2 m E_F}</math>, the Fermi momentum. The <math>E_F</math> can be readily calculated from atom number conservation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Density distributions ==== | ||
We assume that the thermal energy <math>k T \equiv 1/\beta</math> is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings <math>\hbar\omega_{x,y,z}</math> (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell <math>\left\{\vec{r},\vec{p}\right\}</math> (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by | We assume that the thermal energy <math>k T \equiv 1/\beta</math> is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings <math>\hbar\omega_{x,y,z}</math> (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell <math>\left\{\vec{r},\vec{p}\right\}</math> (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by | ||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
Line 51: | Line 49: | ||
Limiting values: <math>{\rm Li}_n(z) \stackrel{z \ll 1}{\rightarrow} z</math> and <math>-{\rm Li}_n(-z) \stackrel{z\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow} \frac{1}{\Gamma(n+1)}\; \ln^n(z)</math>.}. Note that expression for <math>n</math> is correct for any potential <math>V(\vec{r})</math>. The constraint on the number of thermal particles is | Limiting values: <math>{\rm Li}_n(z) \stackrel{z \ll 1}{\rightarrow} z</math> and <math>-{\rm Li}_n(-z) \stackrel{z\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow} \frac{1}{\Gamma(n+1)}\; \ln^n(z)</math>.}. Note that expression for <math>n</math> is correct for any potential <math>V(\vec{r})</math>. The constraint on the number of thermal particles is | ||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
− | N_{th} = \ | + | N_{th} = \int{\text{d}r} \; n_{th}(\vec{r}) |
+ | \,. | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | ==== Thermodynamic properties ==== | ||
+ | Thermodynamic properties can be calculated as the ensemble average given the FD distribution. Most of the calculations are similar to the boson cases. A signature about fermionic atoms is the existence of ''Fermi pressure''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | =====Fermi pressure===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Trapped Fermi Gas at T=0 === | ||
+ | ==== Local Density Approximation ==== | ||
+ | A very important approximation for trapped fermi gas is the <math>Local\ Density\ Approximation</math>. It suggests that any trapping potentials, if varying slowly enough, can be taken in account as a shift in the local fermi energy | ||
+ | :<math>E_F(\vec{r}) = E_F - V(\vec{r}) | ||
+ | \,. | ||
+ | </math>. | ||
+ | Then, ''locally'', the gas can be treated as a free gas at position <math>\vec{r}</math> in the trap. With its <math>p_F(\vec{r}) \equiv \hbar k_F(\vec{r}) \equiv \sqrt{2 m \epsilon_F(\vec{r})} \equiv \hbar (6\pi^2 n_F(\vec{r}))^{1/3}</math> with the local Fermi energy <math>\epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>. The value of <math>E_F</math> is fixed by the number of fermions <math>N</math>, occupying the <math>N</math> lowest energy states of the trap. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Free space Fermi gas ==== | ||
+ | As a simple demonstration of all the definition defined above, we firstly demonstrate the case for a <math>3D</math> fermi gas with <math>V(\vec{r}) = 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At<math>T=0</math>, the distribution can be simplified as | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ | ||
+ | \begin{array}{ll} | ||
+ | 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} < E_F$} \\ | ||
+ | 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} > E_F$} \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right. | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | [[File:fermi_distribution.png|300px|thumb|right|Measurement of the density profile for a degenerate fermi gas in a 2D box potential. Mukherjee ''et. al.'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123401]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | We therefore readity obtain the important result: | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{array}{ll} | ||
+ | E_F&=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left( \frac{3 \pi^2 N}{V} \right)^{2/3}\\ | ||
+ | E_{tot}&=\frac{3}{5}NE_F | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | The density in this case is homogeneous across the whole volume with | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | n \sim k^3_F | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | The fluctuation of density <math>\delta n\rightarrow 0 </math> when <math>T\rightarrow 0</math>. This specific characters for fermions suggest that zero temperature degenerate fermi gas can be treated as a crystallined structure with interatiomic distance on the order of <math>1/k_F</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Harmonically Trapped Fermi gas ==== | ||
+ | A more realistic example in the experiments is the harmonically trapped Fermi gas. Applying these distributions to particles confined in a | ||
+ | harmonic trap, with trapping potential | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2} m (\omega_x^2 x^2 + \omega_y^2 y^2 + | ||
+ | \omega_z^2 z^2) | ||
\,. | \,. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
+ | |||
For a harmonic potential, we obtain | For a harmonic potential, we obtain | ||
:<math> | :<math> | ||
Line 70: | Line 117: | ||
For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition: | For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition: | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape: | Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape: | ||
− | :<math> | + | :<math>\begin{array} |
− | n_F(\ | + | n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \Intp{p} \, f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) \stackrel{T\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow} \int_{\left|\vec{p}\right|< \sqrt{2m(\mu-V(\vec{r}))}} \frac{{\rm d}^3\vec{p}}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\nonumber\\ |
&=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2} | &=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2} | ||
− | \left(\mu - V(\ | + | \left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)^{3/2}. |
− | </math> | + | \end{array}</math> |
− | In terms of local Fermi energy, For a harmonic trap we obtain | + | In terms of local Fermi energy, For a harmonic trap, we obtain |
− | :<math> | + | :<math>\begin{array} |
− | N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\ | + | N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{E_F}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3\nonumber\\ |
\Rightarrow E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3} | \Rightarrow E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3} | ||
− | </math> | + | \end{array}</math> |
and for the zero-temperature profile | and for the zero-temperature profile | ||
− | :<math> | + | :<math>\begin{array} |
− | n_F(\ | + | n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \frac{8}{\pi^2} \frac{N}{R_{Fx} R_{Fy} R_{Fz}} |
\; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i | \; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i | ||
\frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2} | \frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2} | ||
− | </math> | + | \end{array}</math> |
with the Fermi radii <math>R_{F{x,y,z}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 E_F}{m\omega_{x,y,z}^2}}</math>. The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates at unity. | with the Fermi radii <math>R_{F{x,y,z}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 E_F}{m\omega_{x,y,z}^2}}</math>. The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates at unity. | ||
− | === Finite Temperature | + | |
+ | === Finite Temperature === | ||
+ | We discuss about the consequence when <math> T_F >> T >0 </math>. Pictorially, when the temperature deviates from 0, the sharp edge on the fermi surface starts to blur. Part of the fermions right below the fermi surface are thermally excited to the holes above the fermi surface, increasing the total energy of the system. The range of the distribution modified is roughly within <math>E_F\pm kT</math>. It is therefore intuitively to say that most of the correction due to the non-zero temperature involve ''only the density of states right on the fermi surface.'' | ||
+ | ==== Shape of the cloud ==== | ||
At finite <math>T \lesssim T_F</math>, we can understand the shape of the cloud by comparing <math>k T</math> with the local Fermi energy <math>\epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>. | At finite <math>T \lesssim T_F</math>, we can understand the shape of the cloud by comparing <math>k T</math> with the local Fermi energy <math>\epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>. | ||
+ | |||
For the outer regions in the trap where <math>k T \gg \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann) density distribution <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto e^{-\beta V(\vec{r})}</math>. In the inner part of the cloud where <math>k_B T \ll \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the density is of the zero-temperature form <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto (E_F - V(\vec{r}))^{3/2}</math>. | For the outer regions in the trap where <math>k T \gg \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann) density distribution <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto e^{-\beta V(\vec{r})}</math>. In the inner part of the cloud where <math>k_B T \ll \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the density is of the zero-temperature form <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto (E_F - V(\vec{r}))^{3/2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
The Polylogarithm smoothly interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature only affects the far wings of the density distribution where the signal to noise ratio is poor. While for thermal clouds above <math>T_F</math>, the size of the cloud is a direct measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings. | The Polylogarithm smoothly interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature only affects the far wings of the density distribution where the signal to noise ratio is poor. While for thermal clouds above <math>T_F</math>, the size of the cloud is a direct measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings. | ||
Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi energy <math>E_F</math> to be much larger than the level spacing <math>\hbar | Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi energy <math>E_F</math> to be much larger than the level spacing <math>\hbar | ||
\omega_{x,y,z}</math>. For example, in very elongated traps, and for low atom numbers, one can have a situation where this condition is violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions. | \omega_{x,y,z}</math>. For example, in very elongated traps, and for low atom numbers, one can have a situation where this condition is violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Thermodynamic properties ==== | ||
+ | Thermodynamic properties can be perturbatively calculated by expanding the <math>{\rm Li}_n(z)</math> with <math>1/z</math>. | ||
+ | :<math> | ||
+ | \begin{array}{ll} | ||
+ | E(T) &\approx& E(T=0) +\frac{\pi^2}{6}VD(E_F)T^2 \\ | ||
+ | \mu(T)&= &E_F -\frac{\pi^2}{6}\frac{D'(E_F)}{D(E_F)} | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | </math> |
Latest revision as of 05:15, 18 May 2017
We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas. In this section we simply our situation to the spin-polarized fermi gasses (single component). Unlike bosons, due to the Pauli exclusion principle, the lowest interaction is suppressed in the single-component Fermi gasses. Therefore degenerate fermi gasses eventually provided a better ideal gas system.
Fermi-Dirac distribution
The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number and total energy content of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble). For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies , the average occupation of state is
These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles one chooses the chemical potential such that .
Fermi Energy
A very direct consequence of the Fermi - Dirac distribution is the existence of Fermi energy , defined as the energy of the highest occupied state of the non-interacting Fermi gas at . In this case, the FD distribution takes the simple form, we have the simplified Fermi-Dirac distribution
- Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) < \mu$} \\ 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) > \mu$} \\ \end{array} \right. }
The (globally) largest momentum is , the Fermi momentum. The can be readily calculated from atom number conservation.
Density distributions
We assume that the thermal energy is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by
The density distribution of the thermal gas is
where is the de Broglie wavelength. is the -order Polylogarithm, defined as
where the first integral is over dimensions, is the radius vector in dimensions, is any positive half-integer or zero and is the Gamma-function. The Polylogarithm can be expressed as a sum which is often used as the definition of the Polylogarithm. This expression is valid for all complex numbers and where . The definition given in the text is valid for all .
Special cases: , . can be written as . When integrating density distributions to obtain column densities, a useful formula is:
Limiting values: and .}. Note that expression for is correct for any potential . The constraint on the number of thermal particles is
Thermodynamic properties
Thermodynamic properties can be calculated as the ensemble average given the FD distribution. Most of the calculations are similar to the boson cases. A signature about fermionic atoms is the existence of Fermi pressure.
Fermi pressure
Trapped Fermi Gas at T=0
Local Density Approximation
A very important approximation for trapped fermi gas is the . It suggests that any trapping potentials, if varying slowly enough, can be taken in account as a shift in the local fermi energy
- .
Then, locally, the gas can be treated as a free gas at position in the trap. With its with the local Fermi energy . The value of is fixed by the number of fermions , occupying the lowest energy states of the trap.
Free space Fermi gas
As a simple demonstration of all the definition defined above, we firstly demonstrate the case for a fermi gas with .
At, the distribution can be simplified as
- Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} < E_F$} \\ 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} > E_F$} \\ \end{array} \right. }
We therefore readity obtain the important result:
The density in this case is homogeneous across the whole volume with
The fluctuation of density when . This specific characters for fermions suggest that zero temperature degenerate fermi gas can be treated as a crystallined structure with interatiomic distance on the order of .
Harmonically Trapped Fermi gas
A more realistic example in the experiments is the harmonically trapped Fermi gas. Applying these distributions to particles confined in a harmonic trap, with trapping potential
For a harmonic potential, we obtain
with the geometric mean of the trapping frequencies.
In the classical limit at high temperature, we recover the Maxwell-Boltzmann result of a gaussian distribution,
The regime of quantum degeneracy is reached when , or when the temperature . The degeneracy temperature is around or below one for typical experimental conditions.
For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition:
Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape:
- Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle \begin{array} n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \Intp{p} \, f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) \stackrel{T\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow} \int_{\left|\vec{p}\right|< \sqrt{2m(\mu-V(\vec{r}))}} \frac{{\rm d}^3\vec{p}}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\nonumber\\ &=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2} \left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)^{3/2}. \end{array}}
In terms of local Fermi energy, For a harmonic trap, we obtain
- Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle \begin{array} N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{E_F}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3\nonumber\\ \Rightarrow E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3} \end{array}}
and for the zero-temperature profile
- Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{array} n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \frac{8}{\pi^2} \frac{N}{R_{Fx} R_{Fy} R_{Fz}} \; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i \frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2} \end{array}}
with the Fermi radii . The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates at unity.
Finite Temperature
We discuss about the consequence when . Pictorially, when the temperature deviates from 0, the sharp edge on the fermi surface starts to blur. Part of the fermions right below the fermi surface are thermally excited to the holes above the fermi surface, increasing the total energy of the system. The range of the distribution modified is roughly within . It is therefore intuitively to say that most of the correction due to the non-zero temperature involve only the density of states right on the fermi surface.
Shape of the cloud
At finite , we can understand the shape of the cloud by comparing with the local Fermi energy .
For the outer regions in the trap where , the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann) density distribution . In the inner part of the cloud where , the density is of the zero-temperature form .
The Polylogarithm smoothly interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature only affects the far wings of the density distribution where the signal to noise ratio is poor. While for thermal clouds above , the size of the cloud is a direct measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings. Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi energy to be much larger than the level spacing . For example, in very elongated traps, and for low atom numbers, one can have a situation where this condition is violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions.
Thermodynamic properties
Thermodynamic properties can be perturbatively calculated by expanding the with .