Difference between revisions of "Tmp Lecture 23"

From amowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Rouge
imported>Rouge
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(Currently, Beni is editing this section.)
 
 
Rabi frequencies, the dark state is predominantly the state with the weaker coupling. For e.g., <math>\omega _1=0</math>, the dark state is trivially <math>|D>=|g></math>.
 
 
<framebox>
 
<attributes>
 
<width>None</width>
 
<pos>None</pos>
 
</attributes>
 
Lecture XXIII
 
</framebox>
 
 
<br style="clear: both" />
 
 
== Clarification on coherence and dipole moment ==
 
== Clarification on coherence and dipole moment ==
  
 
Consider the coherence of the atom after coherent excitation with a short pulse (shorter than emission rate). Let the state of the atom be <math>|\psi> = C_g |g> + C_e |e></math>.  
 
Consider the coherence of the atom after coherent excitation with a short pulse (shorter than emission rate). Let the state of the atom be <math>|\psi> = C_g |g> + C_e |e></math>.  
Then, the coherence between <math>|e></math> and <math>|g></math> is maximum for <math>C_ e=C_ g=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2}}</math>, i.e. with <math>\frac{\pi }{2}</math> pulse. (Coherence is <math>\rho_{ab}</math> in the density matrix. For a pure state, it is <math>C_g C_e</math>).
+
Then, the coherence between <math>|e></math> and <math>|g></math> is maximum for <math>C_ e=C_ g=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2}}</math>, i.e. with <math>\frac{\pi }{2}</math> pulse. (Coherence is <math>\rho_{ab}</math> in the density matrix. For a pure state, it is <math>C_g C_e</math>). Now, let us consider a system with the atom and (external) EM mode. We consider the case where there is only a single EM mode coupled to the atom (ex, an atom strongly coupled to a cavity). Then, emission couples atomic states with photon number states: <math>|g,1></math> and <math>|e,0></math>. Thus, a <math>\frac{\pi }{2}</math> pulse also maximizes the coherence <math>|g,1></math> and <math>|e,0></math>.  
  
Next, let us consider a system with the atom and (external) EM mode. We consider the case where there is only a single EM mode coupled to the atom (ex, an atom strongly coupled to a cavity). Then, emission couples atomic states with photon number states: <math>|g,1></math> and <math>|e,0></math>. Thus, a <math>\frac{\pi }{2}</math> pulse also maximizes the coherence <math>|g,1></math> and <math>|e,0></math>.  
+
On the other hand, for continuous excitation (not a short pulse), saturation of the atom leads to emission of increasingly incoherent light (Mollow triplet). For Mollow triplet, see Cohen-Tannoudji p:424.
  
 +
Next, consider a coherent light which is very weak. Monochromatic, coherent light is represented by a coherent state<math>|\alpha ></math> that has a Poissonian distribution of photon numbers: <math>|\alpha >=e^{-\frac{1}{2}|\alpha|^{2}}  \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty } \frac{ \alpha^{n}}{\sqrt{n+1}} |n></math>. For <math>|\alpha | \ll 1 </math>, the population of the states with <math>n > 1</math> is negligible, and the atom prepared in a state <math>|g>+\epsilon |e></math> with <math>|\epsilon | \ll 1</math> emits a coherent state of light, in agreement with what is expected for small saturation.
  
Since emission couples atomic states with photon number states <math>a,|g>\rightarrow |o>,|e>\rightarrow |1?</math> (considering only a single em mode, i.e. an atom strongly coupled to a cavity), a <math>\frac{\pi }{2}</math> pulse also maximizes the coherence <underline>
 
<attributes>
 
</attributes>
 
between photon number states |o&gt;,|1&gt;.
 
</underline>. On the other hand, for continuous excitation we know that the <underline>
 
<attributes>
 
</attributes>
 
light is coherent
 
</underline> in the Rayleigh scattering limit (i.e. then the frequency spectrum of the scattered light is a <math>\delta </math>-function at the incident frequency, for an infinitely heavy atom), while saturation of the atom leads to emission of increasingly incoherent light (Mollow triplet). Monochromatic, coherent light is represented qm-ly by a coherent state<math>|\alpha ></math> that has a Poissonian distribution of photon numbers. Thus is <underline>
 
<attributes>
 
</attributes>
 
the full basis of photon number states
 
</underline> light is coherent for the state <math>\alpha >=e^{-\frac{1}{z}}|+|^2\sigma ^{\varpropto }_{h=0}\frac{\alpha ^ n}{\sqrt {n+1}}|n></math>. For <math>|\varpropto |\ll |</math>, the population of the states with <math>n>1</math> is negligible, and the atom prepared in a state <math>|g>+\epsilon |e></math> with <math>|\epsilon |\ll 1</math> emits a coherent state of light(albeit with very small electric-field amplitude), in agreement with what is expected for small saturation.
 
 
Back to dark state in a <math>\lambda </math>-system.
 
 
<br style="clear: both" />
 
 
== First observation of coherent population trapping CPT ==
 
== First observation of coherent population trapping CPT ==
  
:
+
Prepare a multimode laser with regular frequency spacing (<math>v_1, \cdots</math>, in the figure).
  
Multimode laser
+
[[Image:Fig_CPT_convert_20100416042234.jpg]]
  
Image
+
Prepare a gas in a cylindrical volume with gradient of magnetic field in z direction, and observe fluorescence.
  
with regular frequency spacing Gas in a cylindrical volume with gradient of magnetic field applied, observe fluorescence
+
Dark regions show the phaces where Zeeman shift between magnetic sublevels equals frequency difference between laser modes.
  
Image
 
 
dark region where Zeeman shift between magnetic sublevels equals frequency difference between laser modes.
 
 
<br style="clear: both" />
 
 
== Absorption calculation by interference, goin without inversion ==
 
== Absorption calculation by interference, goin without inversion ==
  
(Steve Harris, PRL <underline>
+
(Steve Harris, PRL 62, 1033 (1989))  
<attributes>
+
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v62/i9/p1033_1
</attributes>
 
62
 
</underline>, 1033 (1989))  
 
  
It is commonly believed that we need <math>Ne>N_ g</math> for optical gain. But: Consider a V system with two unstable states that decay by coupling to the <underline>
+
It is commonly believed that we need <math>N_e > N_ g</math> for optical gain. But: Consider a V system with two unstable states that decay by coupling to the same continuum (This is a fairly special situation, e.g. different m-levels do not qualify, since they emit photons of different polarizations, thus the continue <math>|k_1></math> or <math>|k_2></math> are distinguishable.)
<attributes>
 
</attributes>
 
same
 
</underline> continuum.  
 
  
Image  
+
[[Image:Fig_darkresonance_convert_20100416034152.jpg]]
  
i.e. if an atom is placed in <math>|e_1></math> or <math>|e_2></math> and decays to the continuum, it is impossible to tell whether it came from <math>|e_1></math> or <math>|e_2></math>.  
+
Consider three level systems as in the figure where <math>|e_1></math> and <math>|e_2></math> decay to the continuum. A surprising feature of this system is the fact that there is a frequency at which the absorption rate becomes zero. To formally confirm this, we need to compute the second-order matrix element <math>M = \sum_{i =1 ,2} \frac{<continuum| V | e_i ><e_i | V |g> }{ \Delta_i - i \frac{\Gamma_i}{2}}</math>. Then, we know that there is a frequency at which this matrix element almost cancels.  Let the frequency be <math>\omega _ o</math> that corresponds to an energy between the two levels. Note <math>\omega _ o</math> depends on the two matrix elements and we assume <math>(|\Delta_1| , |\Delta_2| \gg r_1, r_2</math>.  
  
(This is a fairly special situation, e.g. different m-levels do not qualify, since they emit photons of different polarizations, thus the continue <math>|k_1></math> or <math>|k_2></math> are distinguishable.) Then the two-photon scattering process <math>|g>\rightarrow |continuum></math> can proceed via two pathways that are fundamentally indistinguishable  
+
One may understand this by considering the fact that the two-photon scattering process <math>|g>\rightarrow |continuum></math> can proceed via two pathways that are fundamentally indistinguishable. In other words, it is impossible to tell whether it came from <math>|e_1></math> or <math>|e_2></math>. Thus, we need to consider quantum interference between them.
  
Images
+
Now assume that with some mechanism we populate, say, <math>|e_2></math> with a small number of atoms <math>N_2<N_ g</math>. These atoms have maximum stimulated emission probability on resonance, <math>|e_2>\rightarrow |g></math>, but there is also even larger absorption, since <math>N_ g>N_2</math>. However, because of the finite linewidth <math>r_2</math> of level <math>|e_2></math>, there is also stimulated emission gain at the "magical" (absorption-free) frequency <math>\omega _ o</math>. Since the <math>N_ g</math> atoms do not absorb here, there is net gain at this frequency in spite of <math>N_2<N_ g</math>, which can lead to "lasing without inversion." Note: this only works if the two excited states decay to the same continuum, such that the paths are indistinguishable. How can a system for lasing without inversion be realized?  
 
 
and we must add the amplitudes. The second order matrix element in perturbation theory
 
 
 
<math>?=\stackrel{?}{i}\frac{<continuum|V'|e_ i><ei|V|g>}{\Delta _ i-i\frac{r_:}{2}}</math>
 
 
 
vanishes (almost exactly) for a certain frequency <math>\omega _ o</math> that corresponds to an energy between the two levels. <math>\omega _ o</math> depends on the two matrix elements and we assume <math>(\Delta ,1,|\Delta _2||ggr_1,r_2</math>. Then tat frequency is not absorbed by atoms in <math>|g></math>, although it would be absorbed if there was only a single excited level. Now assume that with some mechanism we populate, say, <math>|e_2></math> with a small number of atoms <math>N_2<N_ g</math>.  
 
 
 
Images
 
 
 
These atoms have maximum stimulated emission probability on resonance, <math>|e_2>\rightarrow |g></math>, but there is also even larger absorption, since <math>N_ g>N_2</math>. However, because of the finite linewidth <math>r_2</math> of level <math>|e_2></math>, there is also stimulated emission gain at the "magical" (absorption-free) frequency <math>\omega _ o</math>. Since the <math>N_ g</math> atoms do not absorb here, there is net gain at this frequency in spite of <math>N_2<N_ g</math>, which can lead to "lasing without inversion." Note: this only works if the two excited states decay to the same continuum, such that the paths are indistinguishable. How can a system for lasing without inversion be realized?  
 
  
 
Possibility 1: hydrogen and dc electric field  
 
Possibility 1: hydrogen and dc electric field  
  
Images
+
[[Image:Fig_examplessssss_convert_20100416034611.jpg‎]]
  
 
Possibility 2: use ac electric field to mix non-degenerate s state with p state.  
 
Possibility 2: use ac electric field to mix non-degenerate s state with p state.  
  
<br style="clear: both" />
 
 
== Electromagnetically induced transparency ==
 
== Electromagnetically induced transparency ==
  
Line 97: Line 45:
 
Radio Yerevan: "In principle yes, but you need another very powerful laser..."  
 
Radio Yerevan: "In principle yes, but you need another very powerful laser..."  
  
Steve Harris thought initially of special, ionizing excited states. However it is possible to realize the requirement of identical decay paths in a <math>lambda</math>-system with a a(strong) coupling laser. The phenomenon is closely related to coherent population trapping.  
+
Steve Harris thought initially of special, ionizing excited states. However it is possible to realize the requirement of identical decay paths in a <math>\lambda</math>-system with a a(strong) coupling laser. The phenomenon is closely related to coherent population trapping.  
 
 
Image
 
  
For resonant fields <math>\omega _1=\omega _{ge}, \omega _2=\omega _{fe}</math>, we have
+
[[Image:Fig_EIT1_convert_20100416040614.jpg]]
  
Images
+
For resonant fields <math>\omega _1=\omega _{ge}, \omega_2=\omega _{fe}</math>, we have
  
As we turn up the power of the coupling laser the transmission improves and then broadens (in the realistic case of a finite decoherence rate <math>?_{gf}=0</math>, an infinitesimally small coupling Rabi frequency, but the frequency window over which transmission occurs is very narrow and given by <math>\Delta \omega =\Omega c</math>.  
+
[[Image:Fig_EIT2_convert_20100416040633.jpg]]
  
Image
+
As we turn up the power of the coupling laser the transmission improves and then broadens (in the realistic case of a finite decoherence rate <math>\gamma_{gf}=0</math>, an infinitesimally small coupling Rabi frequency, but the frequency window over which transmission occurs is very narrow and given by <math>\Delta \omega =\Omega_c</math>.

Latest revision as of 19:27, 15 April 2010

Clarification on coherence and dipole moment

Consider the coherence of the atom after coherent excitation with a short pulse (shorter than emission rate). Let the state of the atom be . Then, the coherence between and is maximum for , i.e. with pulse. (Coherence is in the density matrix. For a pure state, it is ). Now, let us consider a system with the atom and (external) EM mode. We consider the case where there is only a single EM mode coupled to the atom (ex, an atom strongly coupled to a cavity). Then, emission couples atomic states with photon number states: and . Thus, a pulse also maximizes the coherence and .

On the other hand, for continuous excitation (not a short pulse), saturation of the atom leads to emission of increasingly incoherent light (Mollow triplet). For Mollow triplet, see Cohen-Tannoudji p:424.

Next, consider a coherent light which is very weak. Monochromatic, coherent light is represented by a coherent state that has a Poissonian distribution of photon numbers: . For , the population of the states with is negligible, and the atom prepared in a state with emits a coherent state of light, in agreement with what is expected for small saturation.

First observation of coherent population trapping CPT

Prepare a multimode laser with regular frequency spacing (, in the figure).

Fig CPT convert 20100416042234.jpg

Prepare a gas in a cylindrical volume with gradient of magnetic field in z direction, and observe fluorescence.

Dark regions show the phaces where Zeeman shift between magnetic sublevels equals frequency difference between laser modes.

Absorption calculation by interference, goin without inversion

(Steve Harris, PRL 62, 1033 (1989)) http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v62/i9/p1033_1

It is commonly believed that we need for optical gain. But: Consider a V system with two unstable states that decay by coupling to the same continuum (This is a fairly special situation, e.g. different m-levels do not qualify, since they emit photons of different polarizations, thus the continue or are distinguishable.)

Fig darkresonance convert 20100416034152.jpg

Consider three level systems as in the figure where and decay to the continuum. A surprising feature of this system is the fact that there is a frequency at which the absorption rate becomes zero. To formally confirm this, we need to compute the second-order matrix element . Then, we know that there is a frequency at which this matrix element almost cancels. Let the frequency be that corresponds to an energy between the two levels. Note depends on the two matrix elements and we assume .

One may understand this by considering the fact that the two-photon scattering process can proceed via two pathways that are fundamentally indistinguishable. In other words, it is impossible to tell whether it came from or . Thus, we need to consider quantum interference between them.

Now assume that with some mechanism we populate, say, with a small number of atoms . These atoms have maximum stimulated emission probability on resonance, , but there is also even larger absorption, since . However, because of the finite linewidth of level , there is also stimulated emission gain at the "magical" (absorption-free) frequency . Since the atoms do not absorb here, there is net gain at this frequency in spite of , which can lead to "lasing without inversion." Note: this only works if the two excited states decay to the same continuum, such that the paths are indistinguishable. How can a system for lasing without inversion be realized?

Possibility 1: hydrogen and dc electric field

Fig examplessssss convert 20100416034611.jpg

Possibility 2: use ac electric field to mix non-degenerate s state with p state.

Electromagnetically induced transparency

"Is it possible to send a laser beam through a brick wall?"

Radio Yerevan: "In principle yes, but you need another very powerful laser..."

Steve Harris thought initially of special, ionizing excited states. However it is possible to realize the requirement of identical decay paths in a -system with a a(strong) coupling laser. The phenomenon is closely related to coherent population trapping.

Fig EIT1 convert 20100416040614.jpg

For resonant fields , we have

Fig EIT2 convert 20100416040633.jpg

As we turn up the power of the coupling laser the transmission improves and then broadens (in the realistic case of a finite decoherence rate , an infinitesimally small coupling Rabi frequency, but the frequency window over which transmission occurs is very narrow and given by .