Difference between revisions of "Higher-Order Radiation Processes"

From amowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Wikibot
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
donewcmd error! no pattern match
+
<categorytree mode=pages style="float:right; clear:right; margin-left:1ex; border:1px solid gray; padding:0.7ex; background-color:white;" hideprefix=auto>8.421</categorytree>
\newcommand{\QU}[1]{\par%
+
 
\refstepcounter{question}\emph\thequestion: #1}
+
 
= Higher-Order Radiation Processes =
 
 
== Beyond the dipole approximation ==
 
== Beyond the dipole approximation ==
 
Recall that the interaction Hamiltonian for an atom in an electromagnetic field is given by
 
Recall that the interaction Hamiltonian for an atom in an electromagnetic field is given by
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
H_\mathrm{int} = -\frac{e}{mc} p\cdotA+\frac{e^2}{2mc^2}|A|^2+g_s\mu_B S\cdot({\bf\nabla}\timesA),
+
H_\mathrm{int} = -\frac{e}{mc} p\cdot A+\frac{e^2}{2mc^2}|A|^2+g_s\mu_B S\cdot({\bf\nabla}\times A),
 
</math>
 
</math>
 
where the last term we have so far considered only for static magnetic fields.  Neglecting, as before, the <math>|A|^2</math> term, which is appreciable only for very intense fields,  we now consider more fully the dominant term in the atom-field interaction,
 
where the last term we have so far considered only for static magnetic fields.  Neglecting, as before, the <math>|A|^2</math> term, which is appreciable only for very intense fields,  we now consider more fully the dominant term in the atom-field interaction,
Line 13: Line 12:
 
   b | p \cdot A (r) | a\rangle.
 
   b | p \cdot A (r) | a\rangle.
 
</math>
 
</math>
  For concreteness, we shall take A(r) to be a plane
+
For concreteness, we shall take A(r) to be a plane wave of the form
  wave of the form
 
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   A (r) = A\hat{z} e^{ikx}.
 
   A (r) = A\hat{z} e^{ikx}.
 
</math>
 
</math>
  Expanding the exponential, we have
+
Expanding the exponential, we have
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   H_{ba} = \frac{eA}{\rm mc} \langle b | p_z (1+ikx + (ikx)^2/2 +
 
   H_{ba} = \frac{eA}{\rm mc} \langle b | p_z (1+ikx + (ikx)^2/2 +
Line 32: Line 30:
 
   p_z x = (p_z x - zp_x )/2 + (p_z x + zp_x )/2 .
 
   p_z x = (p_z x - zp_x )/2 + (p_z x + zp_x )/2 .
 
</math>
 
</math>
  The first term of Eq. \ref{eq:hor4} is <math>- \hbar L_y/2</math>, and the matrix element becomes
+
The first term of Eq. \ref{eq:hor4} is <math>- \hbar L_y/2</math>, and the matrix element becomes
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   -\frac{ieAk}{2 m} \langle b | \hbar L_y |
 
   -\frac{ieAk}{2 m} \langle b | \hbar L_y |
Line 38: Line 36:
 
   L_y | a \rangle,
 
   L_y | a \rangle,
 
</math>
 
</math>
  where <math>\mu_B = e\hbar /2 m</math> is the Bohr magneton.
+
where <math>\mu_B = e\hbar /2 m</math> is the Bohr magneton.
  The magnetic field is <math>B = - i k A \hat{y}</math>.
+
The magnetic field is <math>B = - i k A \hat{y}</math>.
  Consequently, Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor5} can be written in the more
+
Consequently, Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor5} can be written in the more
  familiar form <math>-\vec{\mu} \cdotB</math>. (The orbital magnetic moment is <math>\vec{\mu}
+
familiar form <math>-\vec{\mu} \cdot B</math>. (The orbital magnetic moment is <math>\vec{\mu}
 
   = -\mu_B L</math>: the minus sign arises from our convention that <math>e</math> is
 
   = -\mu_B L</math>: the minus sign arises from our convention that <math>e</math> is
  positive.)
+
positive.)
  We can readily generalize the matrix element to
+
We can readily generalize the matrix element to
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   H_{\rm int}(M1) = B \cdot \mu_B\langle b |L + g_sS| a\rangle,
 
   H_{\rm int}(M1) = B \cdot \mu_B\langle b |L + g_sS| a\rangle,
 
</math>
 
</math>
  where we have added the spin dependent term from Eq. \ref{eq:hor_Hint}.  <math>M1</math> indicates that the matrix element is for a magnetic dipole transition.  The strength of the <math>M1</math> transition is set by
+
where we have added the spin dependent term from Eq. \ref{eq:hor_Hint}.  <math>M1</math> indicates that the matrix element is for a magnetic dipole transition.  The strength of the <math>M1</math> transition is set by
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
\mu_B/c = \frac{1}{2}\frac{e\hbar}{mc}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^2}{\hbar c}\frac{\hbar^2}{e m} = \frac{1}{2}\alpha e a_0,
 
\mu_B/c = \frac{1}{2}\frac{e\hbar}{mc}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^2}{\hbar c}\frac{\hbar^2}{e m} = \frac{1}{2}\alpha e a_0,
 
</math>
 
</math>
 
so it is indeed a factor of <math>\alpha</math> weaker than a dipole transition, as we argued above.
 
so it is indeed a factor of <math>\alpha</math> weaker than a dipole transition, as we argued above.
  The second term in Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor4} involves <math>( p_z x + z p_x
+
 
 +
The second term in Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor4} involves <math>( p_z x + z p_x
 
   )/2</math>.
 
   )/2</math>.
  Making use of the commutator relation <math>[ r, H_0 ] = i\hbar
+
Making use of the commutator relation <math>[ r, H_0 ] = i\hbar
  p / m </math>, we
+
p / m </math>, we
  have
+
have
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   \frac{1}{2} (p_z x + z p_x) = \frac{m}{2i\hbar} ([z, H_0 ] x+ z[x,
 
   \frac{1}{2} (p_z x + z p_x) = \frac{m}{2i\hbar} ([z, H_0 ] x+ z[x,
Line 63: Line 62:
 
   \frac{m}{2i\hbar} (- H_0 zx +zx H_0 ).
 
   \frac{m}{2i\hbar} (- H_0 zx +zx H_0 ).
 
</math>
 
</math>
  So, the contribution of this term to <math>H_{ba}</math> is
+
So, the contribution of this term to <math>H_{ba}</math> is
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   \frac{ieA}{mc} \frac{km}{2\hbar i} \langle b | - H_0 zx + zx H_0 |
 
   \frac{ieA}{mc} \frac{km}{2\hbar i} \langle b | - H_0 zx + zx H_0 |
Line 70: Line 69:
 
   = \frac{ieE\omega}{2c} \langle b | zx | a \rangle,
 
   = \frac{ieE\omega}{2c} \langle b | zx | a \rangle,
 
</math>
 
</math>
  where we have taken <math>E = i k A</math>.  This is an electric
+
where we have taken <math>E = i k A</math>.  This is an electric
  quadrupole interaction, and we shall denote the matrix element by
+
quadrupole interaction, and we shall denote the matrix element by
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   H_{\rm int} (E2)^\prime = \frac{ie\omega}{2c} \langle b | zx | a
 
   H_{\rm int} (E2)^\prime = \frac{ie\omega}{2c} \langle b | zx | a
 
   \rangle E.
 
   \rangle E.
 
</math>
 
</math>
  The prime indicates that we are considering only one component of a
+
The prime indicates that we are considering only one component of a
  more general expression involving the matrix element <math>\langle b |r:r|a\rangle</math> of a tensor product.  It is straightforward to verify that the electric quadrupole interaction is also of order <math>\alpha</math>.
+
more general expression involving the matrix element <math>\langle b |r:r|a\rangle</math> of a tensor product.  It is straightforward to verify that the electric quadrupole interaction is also of order <math>\alpha</math>.
  The total matrix element of the second term in the expansion of Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor3} can be written
+
 
 +
The total matrix element of the second term in the expansion of Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor3} can be written
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
   H_{\rm int}^{(2)} = H_{\rm int} (M1) + H_{\rm int} (E2).
 
   H_{\rm int}^{(2)} = H_{\rm int} (M1) + H_{\rm int} (E2).
 
</math>
 
</math>
  Note that
+
Note that <math>H_{\rm int} (M1)</math> is
  <math>H_{\rm int} (M1)</math> is
+
real, whereas <math>H_{\rm int} (E2)</math> is imaginary.  Consequently,
  real, whereas <math>H_{\rm int} (E2)</math> is imaginary.  Consequently,
+
:<math>| H_{\rm int}^{(2)} |^2 = | H_{\rm int} (M1)|^2 + |
:<math>
 
  | H_{\rm int}^{(2)} |^2 = | H_{\rm int} (M1)|^2 + |
 
 
   H_{\rm int}(E2) |^2.
 
   H_{\rm int}(E2) |^2.
 
</math>
 
</math>
  The magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms do not
+
The magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms do not
  interfere.
+
interfere.
    Because transition rates depend on <math>|H_{ba} |^2</math>, the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole rates
+
 
  are both smaller than the dipole rate by <math>\alpha^2 \sim 5 \times
+
Because transition rates depend on <math>|H_{ba} |^2</math>, the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole rates
  10^{-5}</math>.  For this reason they are generally referred to as {\it forbidden}
+
are both smaller than the dipole rate by <math>\alpha^2 \sim 5 \times
  processes.  However, the term is used somewhat loosely, for there
+
10^{-5}</math>.  For this reason they are generally referred to as {\it forbidden}
  are transitions which are much more strongly suppressed due to other
+
processes.  However, the term is used somewhat loosely, for there
  selection rules, as for instance triplet to singlet transitions in
+
are transitions which are much more strongly suppressed due to other
  helium.
+
selection rules, as for instance triplet to singlet transitions in
 +
helium.
 
\begin{table}  
 
\begin{table}  
 
<table border=1>
 
<table border=1>
Line 114: Line 113:
 
\caption{Summary of dipole and higher-order radiation processes.}
 
\caption{Summary of dipole and higher-order radiation processes.}
 
\end{table}
 
\end{table}
 +
 
== Selection rules ==
 
== Selection rules ==
 
A forbidden transition, then, is one that is weaker than an electric dipole-allowed transition by <math>\alpha^n</math> and only appears in some higher-order approximation.  Examples of such higher-order effects are the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms described above, multiphoton processes, the relativistic effects which allow singlet to triplet transitions in helium, and hyperfine interactions within the nucleus.
 
A forbidden transition, then, is one that is weaker than an electric dipole-allowed transition by <math>\alpha^n</math> and only appears in some higher-order approximation.  Examples of such higher-order effects are the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms described above, multiphoton processes, the relativistic effects which allow singlet to triplet transitions in helium, and hyperfine interactions within the nucleus.
Line 147: Line 147:
 
   processes barely skims the subject.  For an authoritative
 
   processes barely skims the subject.  For an authoritative
 
   treatment, the books by Shore and Menzel and by Sobelman are
 
   treatment, the books by Shore and Menzel and by Sobelman are
   recommended.
+
   recommended, as well as "Angular Momentum" by D.M. Brink and G.R. Satchler.
 +
 
 +
== Notes ==
 +
 
 +
[[Category:8.421]]

Latest revision as of 01:56, 12 March 2020


Beyond the dipole approximation

Recall that the interaction Hamiltonian for an atom in an electromagnetic field is given by

where the last term we have so far considered only for static magnetic fields. Neglecting, as before, the term, which is appreciable only for very intense fields, we now consider more fully the dominant term in the atom-field interaction,

For concreteness, we shall take A(r) to be a plane wave of the form

Expanding the exponential, we have

Thus far in the course, we have considered only the first term, the dipole term. If dipole radiation is forbidden, for instance if and have the same parity, then the second term in the parentheses becomes important. Usually, it is times smaller. In particular, since

the expansion in \ref{eq:hor3} is effectively an expansion in . We can rewrite the second term as follows:

The first term of Eq. \ref{eq:hor4} is , and the matrix element becomes

where is the Bohr magneton. The magnetic field is . Consequently, Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor5} can be written in the more familiar form . (The orbital magnetic moment is : the minus sign arises from our convention that is positive.) We can readily generalize the matrix element to

where we have added the spin dependent term from Eq. \ref{eq:hor_Hint}. indicates that the matrix element is for a magnetic dipole transition. The strength of the transition is set by

so it is indeed a factor of weaker than a dipole transition, as we argued above.

The second term in Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor4} involves . Making use of the commutator relation , we have

So, the contribution of this term to is

where we have taken . This is an electric quadrupole interaction, and we shall denote the matrix element by

The prime indicates that we are considering only one component of a more general expression involving the matrix element of a tensor product. It is straightforward to verify that the electric quadrupole interaction is also of order .

The total matrix element of the second term in the expansion of Eq.\ \ref{eq:hor3} can be written

Note that is real, whereas is imaginary. Consequently,

The magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms do not interfere.

Because transition rates depend on , the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole rates are both smaller than the dipole rate by . For this reason they are generally referred to as {\it forbidden} processes. However, the term is used somewhat loosely, for there are transitions which are much more strongly suppressed due to other selection rules, as for instance triplet to singlet transitions in helium. \begin{table}

Transition Operator Parity
Electric Dipole -
Magnetic Dipole +
Electric Quadrupole +

\caption{Summary of dipole and higher-order radiation processes.} \end{table}

Selection rules

A forbidden transition, then, is one that is weaker than an electric dipole-allowed transition by and only appears in some higher-order approximation. Examples of such higher-order effects are the magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole terms described above, multiphoton processes, the relativistic effects which allow singlet to triplet transitions in helium, and hyperfine interactions within the nucleus. To derive selection rules for the transitions we have discussed above, it is useful to express the matrix elements in terms of spherical tensor operators:

where is a spherical tensor operator of rank . The operators transform under rotations like the spherical harmonics , and any operator can be written as a linear combination of these spherical tensors. By the Wigner-Eckart Theorem, we can express the matrix element

in terms of a reduced matrix element and a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient \linebreak. In order for the latter to be nonzero, the triangle rule requires that \linebreak, while conservation of angular momentum requires . Since the operators and responsible for and transitions are both vectors, i.e. tensors of rank , these transitions are both governed by the dipole selection rules

Since is a polar vector and is an axial vector, transitions are allowed only between states of opposite parity and transitions are allowed only between states of the same parity. The operator responsible for transitions is a spherical tensor of rank 2. For example,

Thus, electric quadrupole transitions are allowed only between states connected by tensors , requiring:

In addition, transitions are forbidden in all of the cases considered above, since requires (for any interaction that does not couple to spin) whereas absorption or emission of a photon implies .

 This discussion of matrix elements, selection rules, and radiative
 processes barely skims the subject.  For an authoritative
 treatment, the books by Shore and Menzel and by Sobelman are
 recommended, as well as "Angular Momentum" by D.M. Brink and G.R. Satchler.

Notes