Difference between revisions of "Ideal Fermi Gas"

From amowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Junruli
imported>Junruli
 
(59 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas.
+
We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas. In this section we simply our situation to the spin-polarized fermi gasses (single component). Unlike bosons, due to the Pauli exclusion principle, the lowest <math>s-wave</math> interaction is suppressed in the single-component Fermi gasses. Therefore degenerate fermi gasses eventually provided a better ideal gas system.  
== Fermi-Dirac distribution ==
+
=== Fermi-Dirac distribution ===
 
The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number <math>N</math> and total energy content <math>E_{\rm tot}</math> of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble).
 
The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number <math>N</math> and total energy content <math>E_{\rm tot}</math> of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble).
 
For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies <math>\epsilon_i</math>, the average occupation of state <math>i</math> is
 
For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies <math>\epsilon_i</math>, the average occupation of state <math>i</math> is
Line 7: Line 7:
 
\,.
 
\,.
 
</math>
 
</math>
These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles <math>N</math> one chooses the chemical potential <math>\mu</math> such that <math>N
+
These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles <math>N</math> one chooses the chemical potential <math>\mu</math> such that <math>N=\sum_i  f(\epsilon_i, \mu, T)</math>.
\sum_i  f(\epsilon_i, \mu, T)</math>.
+
=== Fermi Energy ===
== Trapped Fermi Gas ==
+
A very direct consequence of the Fermi - Dirac distribution is the existence of Fermi energy <math>E_F</math>, defined as the energy of the highest occupied state of the non-interacting Fermi gas at <math>T=0</math>. In this case, the FD distribution takes the simple form, we have the simplified Fermi-Dirac distribution
=== Harmonic Trap ===
 
Applying these distributions to particles confined in a
 
harmonic trap, with trapping potential
 
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2} m (\omega_x^2 x^2 + \omega_y^2 y^2 +
+
  f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{
\omega_z^2 z^2)  
+
\begin{array}{ll}
\,.
+
    1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) < \mu$} \\
 +
    0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) > \mu$} \\
 +
\end{array}
 +
\right.  
 
</math>
 
</math>
 +
The (globally) largest momentum is <math>p_F \equiv \hbar k_F \equiv \sqrt{2 m E_F}</math>, the Fermi momentum. The <math>E_F</math> can be readily calculated from atom number conservation.
 +
 +
==== Density distributions ====
 
We assume that the thermal energy <math>k T \equiv 1/\beta</math> is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings <math>\hbar\omega_{x,y,z}</math> (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell <math>\left\{\vec{r},\vec{p}\right\}</math> (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by  
 
We assume that the thermal energy <math>k T \equiv 1/\beta</math> is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings <math>\hbar\omega_{x,y,z}</math> (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell <math>\left\{\vec{r},\vec{p}\right\}</math> (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by  
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} +
 
f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} +
V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k T} \mp 1}  
+
V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k T} + 1}  
 
\,.
 
\,.
 
</math>
 
</math>
 
The density distribution of the thermal gas is
 
The density distribution of the thermal gas is
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
n_{th}(\vec{r}) &=& \Intp{p}\; f(\vec{r},\vec{p})\nonumber\\
+
n_{th}(\vec{r}) = - \frac{1}{\lambda_{ dB}^3}\, {\rm Li}_{3/2}\left(-
&=& \pm \frac{1}{\lambda_{ dB}^3}\, {\rm Li}_{3/2}\left(\pm
 
 
e^{\beta\left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)}\right)
 
e^{\beta\left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)}\right)
 
\,.
 
\,.
 
</math>
 
</math>
where <math>\sqrt{\frac{2\pi \hbar^2}{m k_B T}}</math> is the de Broglie wavelength. ${\rm Li}_n(z)$ is the <math>n^{th}</math>-order Polylogarithm, defined as
+
where <math>\sqrt{\frac{2\pi \hbar^2}{m k_B T}}</math> is the de Broglie wavelength. <math>{\rm Li}_n(z)</math> is the <math>n^{th}</math>-order Polylogarithm, defined as
 
:<math>
 
:<math>
 
     {\rm Li}_n(z)\; \equiv\; \frac{1}{\pi^n} \int {\rm d}^{2n}r \frac{1}{e^{\vec{r}^2}/z - 1}\; \stackrel{n\ne 0}{=}\; \frac{1}{\Gamma(n)}\int_0^\infty {\rm d}q \frac{q^{n-1}}{e^q/z - 1}
 
     {\rm Li}_n(z)\; \equiv\; \frac{1}{\pi^n} \int {\rm d}^{2n}r \frac{1}{e^{\vec{r}^2}/z - 1}\; \stackrel{n\ne 0}{=}\; \frac{1}{\Gamma(n)}\int_0^\infty {\rm d}q \frac{q^{n-1}}{e^q/z - 1}
 
\,.
 
\,.
 
</math>
 
</math>
where the first integral is over $2n$ dimensions, $\vec{r}$ is
+
where the first integral is over <math>2n</math> dimensions, <math>\vec{r}</math> is the radius vector in <math>2n</math> dimensions, <math>n</math> is any positive
the radius vector in $2n$ dimensions, $n$ is any positive
+
half-integer or zero and <math>\Gamma(n)</math> is the Gamma-function. The Polylogarithm can be expressed as a sum <math>{\rm Li}_n(z) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{z^k}{k^n}</math> which is often used as the definition of the Polylogarithm.  This expression is valid for all complex numbers <math>n</math> and <math>z</math> where <math>|z|\le 1</math>. The definition given in the text is valid for all <math>z\le l</math>.
half-integer or zero and $\Gamma(n)$ is the Gamma-function
 
\footnote{The Polylogarithm appears naturally in integrals over
 
Bose-Einstein or Fermi-Dirac distributions.  Some
 
authors~\cite{huan87} use different functions for bosons
 
$g_n(z)={\rm Li}_n(z)$ and for fermions
 
$f_n(z)=-{\rm Li}_n(-z)$. The Polylogarithm can be
 
expressed as a sum ${\rm Li}_n(z) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty
 
\frac{z^k}{k^n}$ which is often used as the definition of
 
the Polylogarithm.  This expression is valid for all complex
 
numbers $n$ and $z$ where $|z|\le 1$. The definition
 
given in the text is valid for all $z\le l$.
 
  
Special cases: ${\rm Li}_0(z) = \frac{1}{1/z - 1}$,
+
Special cases: <math>{\rm Li}_0(z) = \frac{1}{1/z - 1}</math>, <math>{\rm Li_1}(z) = -\ln(1-z)</math>. <math>f(\vec{r},\vec{p})</math> can
${\rm Li_1}(z) = -\ln(1-z)$. $f(\vec{r},\vec{p})$ can
+
be written as <math>-{\rm Li}_0(- \exp[\beta(\mu-\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} - V(\vec{r}))])</math>. When integrating density distributions to obtain column densities, a useful formula is:
be written as $\pm{\rm Li}_0(\pm
+
:<math>
\exp[\beta(\mu-\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} - V(\vec{r}))])$. When integrating density distributions to obtain column densities, a useful formula is:
 
\begin{equation}
 
 
     \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \;{\rm Li}_n(z\,e^{- x^2}) = \sqrt{\pi}\; {\rm Li}_{n+1/2}(z)
 
     \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx \;{\rm Li}_n(z\,e^{- x^2}) = \sqrt{\pi}\; {\rm Li}_{n+1/2}(z)
    \label{e:polyintegral}.
+
\,.
\end{equation}
+
</math>
Limiting values: ${\rm Li}_n(z) \stackrel{z \ll 1}{\rightarrow} z$ and $-{\rm Li}_n(-z) \stackrel{z\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow} \frac{1}{\Gamma(n+1)}\; \ln^n(z)$.}.
+
Limiting values: <math>{\rm Li}_n(z) \stackrel{z \ll 1}{\rightarrow} z</math> and <math>-{\rm Li}_n(-z) \stackrel{z\rightarrow\infty}{\rightarrow} \frac{1}{\Gamma(n+1)}\; \ln^n(z)</math>.}. Note that expression for <math>n</math> is correct for any potential <math>V(\vec{r})</math>. The constraint on the number of thermal particles is
Note that expression~\ref{e:density} is correct for any potential
+
:<math>
$V(\vec{r})$. The constraint on the number of thermal particles
+
N_{th} = \int{\text{d}r} \; n_{th}(\vec{r})
is
+
\,.
\begin{equation}
+
</math>
N_{th} = \Int{r} \; n_{th}(\vec{r})
+
==== Thermodynamic properties ====
\end{equation}
+
Thermodynamic properties can be calculated as the ensemble average given the FD distribution. Most of the calculations are similar to the boson cases. A signature about fermionic atoms is the existence of ''Fermi pressure''.
For a harmonic potential (~\ref{e:potential}), we obtain
+
 
\begin{equation}
+
=====Fermi pressure=====
N_{th} = \pm \left(\frac{k_B T}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3 {\rm
+
 
Li}_3(\pm\,e^{\beta\mu}) \label{e:numberofatoms}
+
=== Trapped Fermi Gas at T=0 ===
\end{equation}
+
==== Local Density Approximation ====
with $\bar{\omega} = (\omega_x \omega_y \omega_z)^{1/3}$ the
+
A very important approximation for trapped fermi gas is the <math>Local\ Density\ Approximation</math>. It suggests that any trapping potentials, if varying slowly enough, can be taken in account as a shift in the local fermi energy
geometric mean of the trapping frequencies.
+
:<math>E_F(\vec{r}) = E_F - V(\vec{r})
 +
\,.
 +
</math>.
 +
Then, ''locally'', the gas can be treated as a free gas at position <math>\vec{r}</math> in the trap. With its <math>p_F(\vec{r}) \equiv \hbar k_F(\vec{r}) \equiv \sqrt{2 m \epsilon_F(\vec{r})} \equiv \hbar (6\pi^2 n_F(\vec{r}))^{1/3}</math> with the local Fermi energy <math>\epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>. The value of <math>E_F</math> is fixed by the number of fermions <math>N</math>, occupying the <math>N</math> lowest energy states of the trap.
 +
 
 +
==== Free space Fermi gas ====
 +
As a simple demonstration of all the definition defined above, we firstly demonstrate the case for a <math>3D</math> fermi gas with <math>V(\vec{r}) = 0</math>.
 +
 
 +
At<math>T=0</math>, the distribution can be simplified as
 +
:<math>
 +
  f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}  - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{
 +
\begin{array}{ll}
 +
    1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}  < E_F$} \\
 +
    0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} > E_F$} \\
 +
\end{array}
 +
\right.
 +
</math>
 +
[[File:fermi_distribution.png|300px|thumb|right|Measurement of the density profile for a degenerate fermi gas in a 2D box potential. Mukherjee ''et. al.'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123401]]
  
In the classical limit at high temperature, we recover the
+
We therefore readity obtain the important result:
Maxwell-Boltzmann result of a gaussian distribution,
+
:<math>
\begin{equation}
+
\begin{array}{ll}
 +
  E_F&=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left( \frac{3 \pi^2 N}{V} \right)^{2/3}\\
 +
E_{tot}&=\frac{3}{5}NE_F
 +
\end{array}
 +
</math>
 +
The density in this case is homogeneous across the whole volume with
 +
:<math>
 +
n \sim k^3_F
 +
</math>
 +
The fluctuation of density <math>\delta n\rightarrow 0 </math> when <math>T\rightarrow 0</math>. This specific characters for fermions suggest that zero temperature degenerate fermi gas can be treated as a crystallined structure with interatiomic distance on the order of <math>1/k_F</math>.
 +
 
 +
==== Harmonically Trapped Fermi gas ====
 +
A more realistic example in the experiments is the harmonically trapped Fermi gas. Applying these distributions to particles confined in a
 +
harmonic trap, with trapping potential
 +
:<math>
 +
V(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2} m (\omega_x^2 x^2 + \omega_y^2 y^2 +
 +
\omega_z^2 z^2)
 +
\,.
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
For a harmonic potential, we obtain
 +
:<math>
 +
N_{th} = - \left(\frac{k_B T}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3 {\rm
 +
Li}_3(-\,e^{\beta\mu})
 +
</math>
 +
with <math>\bar{\omega} = (\omega_x \omega_y \omega_z)^{1/3}</math> the geometric mean of the trapping frequencies.
 +
 
 +
In the classical limit at high temperature, we recover the Maxwell-Boltzmann result of a gaussian distribution,
 +
:<math>
 
     n_{cl}(\vec{r}) = \frac{N}{\pi^{3/2} \sigma_x \sigma_y \sigma_z} e^{- \sum_i x_i^2/\sigma_{x_i}^2} \qquad {\rm with} \; \sigma_{x,y,z}^2 = \frac{2 k_B T}{m \omega_{x,y,z}^2}
 
     n_{cl}(\vec{r}) = \frac{N}{\pi^{3/2} \sigma_x \sigma_y \sigma_z} e^{- \sum_i x_i^2/\sigma_{x_i}^2} \qquad {\rm with} \; \sigma_{x,y,z}^2 = \frac{2 k_B T}{m \omega_{x,y,z}^2}
\end{equation}
+
\,.
 +
</math>
  
The regime of quantum degeneracy is reached when $\lambda_{dB}
+
The regime of quantum degeneracy is reached when <math>\lambda_{dB} \approx n ^{-1/3}</math>, or when the temperature <math>T \approx T_{\rm deg}</math>.  The degeneracy temperature <math>T_{\rm deg} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m k_B} n^{2/3}</math> is around or below one <math>\mu \rm K</math> for typical experimental conditions.
\approx n ^{-1/3}$, or when the temperature $T \approx T_{\rm
 
deg}$.  The degeneracy temperature $T_{\rm deg} =
 
\frac{\hbar^2}{2m k_B} n^{2/3}$ is around or below one $\mu \rm K$
 
for typical experimental conditions.
 
  
For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state
+
For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition:
becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. The
 
density profile of the ideal gas condensate is given by the square
 
of the harmonic oscillator ground state wave function:
 
\begin{equation}
 
n_c(\vec{r}) = \frac{N_0}{\pi^{3/2} d_x d_y d_z} e^{-\sum_i
 
x_i^2/d_{x_i}^2}
 
\end{equation}
 
where $d_{x_i} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m \omega_{x_i}}}$ are the
 
harmonic oscillator lengths. The density profile of the thermal,
 
non-condensed component can be obtained from Eq.~\ref{e:density}
 
if the chemical potential $\mu$ is known. As the number of
 
condensed bosons $N_0$ grows to be significantly larger than 1,
 
the chemical potential $\mu \approx - \frac{k_B T}{N_0}$ (from
 
Eq.~\ref{e:BoseFermidist} for $E_0 = 0$) will be much closer to
 
the ground state energy than the first excited harmonic oscillator
 
state. Thus we set $\mu = 0$ in the expression for the
 
non-condensed density $n_{th}$ and number $N_{th}$ and obtain
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
n_{th}(\vec{r}) &=& \frac{1}{\lambda_{dB}^3} {\rm Li}_{3/2}(e^{-V(\vec{r})/k_B T})\\
 
N_{th} &=& N (T/T_C)^3\qquad \mbox{for $T<T_C$}
 
\end{eqnarray}
 
with the critical temperature for Bose-Einstein condensation in a
 
harmonic trap
 
\begin{equation}
 
T_C \equiv \hbar \bar{\omega}\; (N / \zeta(3))^{1/3} = 0.94 \;
 
\hbar \bar{\omega} N^{1/3}
 
\end{equation}
 
where $\zeta(3) = {\rm Li}_3(1) \approx 1.202$. At $T=T_C$, the
 
condition for Bose condensation is fulfilled in the center of the
 
trap, $n = {\rm Li}_{3/2}(1)/\lambda_{dB}^3 =
 
2.612/\lambda_{dB}^3$. For lower temperatures, the maximum density
 
of the thermal cloud is ``quantum saturated'' at the critical value
 
$n_{th} = 2.612/\lambda_{dB}^3 \propto T^{3/2}$. The condensate
 
fraction in a harmonic trap is given by
 
\begin{equation}
 
N_0/N = 1 - (T/T_C)^3
 
\end{equation}
 
For $T/T_C = 0.5$ the condensate fraction is already about 90\%.
 
  
For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells
+
Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape:
smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition:
+
:<math>\begin{array}
\begin{equation}
+
n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \Intp{p} \, f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) \stackrel{T\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow} \int_{\left|\vec{p}\right|< \sqrt{2m(\mu-V(\vec{r}))}} \frac{{\rm d}^3\vec{p}}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\nonumber\\
  f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{%
 
\begin{array}{ll}
 
    1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) < \mu$} \\
 
    0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) > \mu$} \\
 
\end{array}%
 
\right. \label{e:fermiphasespace}
 
\end{equation}
 
Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its
 
gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape:
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
n_F(\vect{r}) &=& \Intp{p} \, f(\vect{r},\vect{p}) \stackrel{T\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow} \int_{\left|\vect{p}\right|< \sqrt{2m(\mu-V(\vect{r}))}} \frac{{\rm d}^3\vect{p}}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\nonumber\\
 
 
&=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2}
 
&=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2}
\left(\mu - V(\vect{r})\right)^{3/2}.
+
\left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)^{3/2}.
\end{eqnarray}
+
\end{array}</math>
  
From Eq.~\ref{e:fermiphasespace} we observe that at zero
+
In terms of local Fermi energy, For a harmonic trap, we obtain
temperature, $\mu$ is the energy of the highest occupied state of
+
:<math>\begin{array}
the non-interacting Fermi gas, also called the Fermi energy $E_F$.
+
     N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{E_F}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3\nonumber\\
The (globally) largest momentum is $p_F \equiv \hbar k_F \equiv
 
\sqrt{2 m E_F}$, the Fermi momentum. {\it Locally}, at position
 
$\vect{r}$ in the trap, it is $p_F(\vect{r}) \equiv \hbar
 
k_F(\vect{r}) \equiv \sqrt{2 m \epsilon_F(\vect{r})} \equiv \hbar
 
(6\pi^2 n_F(\vect{r}))^{1/3}$ with the local Fermi energy
 
$\epsilon_F(\vect{r})$ which equals $\mu(\vect{r},T=0) = E_F -
 
V(\vect{r})$. The value of $E_F$ is fixed by the number of
 
fermions $N$, occupying the $N$ lowest energy states of the trap.
 
For a harmonic trap we obtain
 
\begin{eqnarray}
 
     N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\vect{r}) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{E_F}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3\nonumber\\
 
 
\Rightarrow    E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3}
 
\Rightarrow    E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3}
    \label{e:Ferminumber}
+
\end{array}</math>
\end{eqnarray}
 
 
and for the zero-temperature profile
 
and for the zero-temperature profile
\begin{eqnarray}
+
:<math>\begin{array}
n_F(\vect{r}) &=& \frac{8}{\pi^2} \frac{N}{R_{Fx} R_{Fy} R_{Fz}}
+
n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \frac{8}{\pi^2} \frac{N}{R_{Fx} R_{Fy} R_{Fz}}
 
\; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i
 
\; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i
 
\frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2}
 
\frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2}
\label{e:Fermidensity}
+
\end{array}</math>
\end{eqnarray}
+
with the Fermi radii <math>R_{F{x,y,z}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 E_F}{m\omega_{x,y,z}^2}}</math>. The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates at unity.
with the Fermi radii $R_{F{x,y,z}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 E_F}{m
+
 
\omega_{x,y,z}^2}}$. The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a
+
=== Finite Temperature ===
rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal
+
We discuss about the consequence when <math> T_F >> T >0 </math>. Pictorially, when the temperature deviates from 0, the sharp edge on the fermi surface starts to blur. Part of the fermions right below the fermi surface are thermally excited to the holes above the fermi surface, increasing the total energy of the system. The range of the distribution modified is roughly within <math>E_F\pm kT</math>. It is therefore intuitively to say that most of the correction due to the non-zero temperature involve ''only the density of states right on the fermi surface.''
cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates
+
==== Shape of the cloud ====
at unity.
+
At finite <math>T \lesssim T_F</math>, we can understand the shape of the cloud by comparing <math>k T</math> with the local Fermi energy <math>\epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>.
 +
 
 +
For the outer regions in the trap where <math>k T \gg \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann) density distribution <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto e^{-\beta V(\vec{r})}</math>. In the inner part of the cloud where <math>k_B T \ll \epsilon_F(\vec{r})</math>, the density is of the zero-temperature form <math>n(\vec{r}) \propto (E_F - V(\vec{r}))^{3/2}</math>.  
  
At finite $T \lesssim T_F$, we can understand the shape of the
+
The Polylogarithm smoothly interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature only affects the far wings of the density distribution where the signal to noise ratio is poor. While for thermal clouds above <math>T_F</math>, the size of the cloud is a direct measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings.
cloud by comparing $k_B T$ with the local Fermi energy
+
Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi energy <math>E_F</math> to be much larger than the level spacing <math>\hbar
$\epsilon_F(\vect{r})$. For the outer regions in the trap where $k_B
+
\omega_{x,y,z}</math>. For example, in very elongated traps, and for low atom numbers, one can have a situation where this condition is violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions.
T \gg \epsilon_F(\vect{r})$, the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann)
 
density distribution $n(\vect{r}) \propto e^{-\beta V(\vect{r})}$. In
 
the inner part of the cloud where $k_B T \ll
 
\epsilon_F(\vect{r})$, the density is of the zero-temperature form $n(\vect{r})
 
\propto (E_F - V(\vect{r}))^{3/2}$. The Polylogarithm smoothly
 
interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the
 
difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature
 
only affects the far wings of the density distribution. While for
 
thermal clouds above $T_F$, the size of the cloud is a direct
 
measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract
 
the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings.
 
  
Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi
+
==== Thermodynamic properties ====
energy $E_F$ to be much larger than the level spacing $\hbar
+
Thermodynamic properties can be perturbatively calculated by expanding the <math>{\rm Li}_n(z)</math> with <math>1/z</math>.
\omega_{x,y,z}$. For example, in very elongated traps and for low
+
:<math>
atom numbers one can have a situation where this condition is
+
\begin{array}{ll}
violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions.
+
E(T) &\approx& E(T=0) +\frac{\pi^2}{6}VD(E_F)T^2 \\
 +
\mu(T)&= &E_F -\frac{\pi^2}{6}\frac{D'(E_F)}{D(E_F)}
 +
\end{array}
 +
</math>

Latest revision as of 05:15, 18 May 2017

We talk about basics for an ideal Fermi gas. In this section we simply our situation to the spin-polarized fermi gasses (single component). Unlike bosons, due to the Pauli exclusion principle, the lowest interaction is suppressed in the single-component Fermi gasses. Therefore degenerate fermi gasses eventually provided a better ideal gas system.

Fermi-Dirac distribution

The particles in an atom trap are isolated from the surroundings, thus the atom number and total energy content of the atomic cloud is fixed. However, it is convenient to consider the system to be in contact with a reservoir, with which it can exchange particles and energy (grand canonical ensemble). For non-interacting particles with single-particle energies , the average occupation of state is

These is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For a fixed number of particles one chooses the chemical potential such that .

Fermi Energy

A very direct consequence of the Fermi - Dirac distribution is the existence of Fermi energy , defined as the energy of the highest occupied state of the non-interacting Fermi gas at . In this case, the FD distribution takes the simple form, we have the simplified Fermi-Dirac distribution

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) < \mu$} \\ 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} + V(\vec{r}) > \mu$} \\ \end{array} \right. }

The (globally) largest momentum is , the Fermi momentum. The can be readily calculated from atom number conservation.

Density distributions

We assume that the thermal energy is much larger than the quantum mechanical level spacings (Thomas-Fermi approximation). In this case, the occupation of a phase space cell (which is the phase-space density times $h^3$) is given by

The density distribution of the thermal gas is

where is the de Broglie wavelength. is the -order Polylogarithm, defined as

where the first integral is over dimensions, is the radius vector in dimensions, is any positive half-integer or zero and is the Gamma-function. The Polylogarithm can be expressed as a sum which is often used as the definition of the Polylogarithm. This expression is valid for all complex numbers and where . The definition given in the text is valid for all .

Special cases: , . can be written as . When integrating density distributions to obtain column densities, a useful formula is:

Limiting values: and .}. Note that expression for is correct for any potential . The constraint on the number of thermal particles is

Thermodynamic properties

Thermodynamic properties can be calculated as the ensemble average given the FD distribution. Most of the calculations are similar to the boson cases. A signature about fermionic atoms is the existence of Fermi pressure.

Fermi pressure

Trapped Fermi Gas at T=0

Local Density Approximation

A very important approximation for trapped fermi gas is the . It suggests that any trapping potentials, if varying slowly enough, can be taken in account as a shift in the local fermi energy

.

Then, locally, the gas can be treated as a free gas at position in the trap. With its with the local Fermi energy . The value of is fixed by the number of fermions , occupying the lowest energy states of the trap.

Free space Fermi gas

As a simple demonstration of all the definition defined above, we firstly demonstrate the case for a fermi gas with .

At, the distribution can be simplified as

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle f(\vec{r},\vec{p},T) = \frac{1}{e^{(\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} - \mu)/k_B T} + 1} \stackrel{T \rightarrow 0} \rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} < E_F$} \\ 0, & \hbox{$\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m} > E_F$} \\ \end{array} \right. }
File:Fermi distribution.png
Measurement of the density profile for a degenerate fermi gas in a 2D box potential. Mukherjee et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123401

We therefore readity obtain the important result:

The density in this case is homogeneous across the whole volume with

The fluctuation of density when . This specific characters for fermions suggest that zero temperature degenerate fermi gas can be treated as a crystallined structure with interatiomic distance on the order of .

Harmonically Trapped Fermi gas

A more realistic example in the experiments is the harmonically trapped Fermi gas. Applying these distributions to particles confined in a harmonic trap, with trapping potential

For a harmonic potential, we obtain

with the geometric mean of the trapping frequencies.

In the classical limit at high temperature, we recover the Maxwell-Boltzmann result of a gaussian distribution,

The regime of quantum degeneracy is reached when , or when the temperature . The degeneracy temperature is around or below one for typical experimental conditions.

For {\bf bosons}, it is at this point that the ground state becomes macroscopically occupied and the condensate forms. For {\bf fermions}, the occupation of available phase space cells smoothly approaches unity without any sudden transition:

Accordingly, also the density profile changes smoothly from its gaussian form at high temperatures to its zero temperature shape:

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle \begin{array} n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \Intp{p} \, f(\vec{r},\vec{p}) \stackrel{T\rightarrow 0}{\rightarrow} \int_{\left|\vec{p}\right|< \sqrt{2m(\mu-V(\vec{r}))}} \frac{{\rm d}^3\vec{p}}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\nonumber\\ &=& \frac{1}{6\pi^2} \left(\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\right)^{3/2} \left(\mu - V(\vec{r})\right)^{3/2}. \end{array}}

In terms of local Fermi energy, For a harmonic trap, we obtain

Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{array}"): {\displaystyle \begin{array} N &=& \Int{r} \; n_F(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{6} \left(\frac{E_F}{\hbar \bar{\omega}}\right)^3\nonumber\\ \Rightarrow E_F &=& \hbar \bar{\omega} (6 N)^{1/3} \end{array}}

and for the zero-temperature profile

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{array} n_F(\vec{r}) &=& \frac{8}{\pi^2} \frac{N}{R_{Fx} R_{Fy} R_{Fz}} \; \left[\max \left(1 - \sum_i \frac{x_i^2}{R_{Fi}^2},0\right)\right]^{3/2} \end{array}}

with the Fermi radii . The profile of the degenerate Fermi gas has a rather flat top compared to the gaussian profile of a thermal cloud, as the occupancy of available phase space cells saturates at unity.

Finite Temperature

We discuss about the consequence when . Pictorially, when the temperature deviates from 0, the sharp edge on the fermi surface starts to blur. Part of the fermions right below the fermi surface are thermally excited to the holes above the fermi surface, increasing the total energy of the system. The range of the distribution modified is roughly within . It is therefore intuitively to say that most of the correction due to the non-zero temperature involve only the density of states right on the fermi surface.

Shape of the cloud

At finite , we can understand the shape of the cloud by comparing with the local Fermi energy .

For the outer regions in the trap where , the gas shows a classical (Boltzmann) density distribution . In the inner part of the cloud where , the density is of the zero-temperature form .

The Polylogarithm smoothly interpolates between the two regimes. We notice here the difficulty of thermometry for very cold Fermi clouds: Temperature only affects the far wings of the density distribution where the signal to noise ratio is poor. While for thermal clouds above , the size of the cloud is a direct measure of temperature, for cold Fermi clouds one needs to extract the temperature from the shape of the distribution's wings. Note that the validity of the above derivation required the Fermi energy to be much larger than the level spacing . For example, in very elongated traps, and for low atom numbers, one can have a situation where this condition is violated in the tightly confining radial dimensions.

Thermodynamic properties

Thermodynamic properties can be perturbatively calculated by expanding the with .