imported>Wikipost |
imported>Ichuang |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | = Quantum states and dynamics of photons =
| |
| | | |
| == Non-classical light == | | == Non-classical light == |
Line 255: |
Line 254: |
| a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagger = \frac{a+b}{\sqrt{2}} | | a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagger = \frac{a+b}{\sqrt{2}} |
| \\ | | \\ |
− | a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagger = \frac{a-b}{\sqrt{2}} | + | a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagg |
− | \,.
| |
− | \end{array}</math>
| |
− | Note that we have adopted a convention which does away with imaginary
| |
− | phases, for convenience; in the literature, you may find different
| |
− | convention used, to reflect phases imparted by actual half-silvered
| |
− | mirror beamsplitters used in the laboratory.
| |
− | The detected signal <math>I_-</math> thus results from
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | I_- = a^\dagger _0 a_0 - b^\dagger _0 b_0 = a b^\dagger + a^\dagger b
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | If mode <math>b</math> has a strong coherent state <math>|\beta{\rangle}</math> as input, with
| |
− | <math>\beta = |\beta|e^{i\theta}</math>, then we may write as a normalized output
| |
− | signal,
| |
− | :<math>\begin{array}{rcl}
| |
− | X_\theta &=& \frac{I_-}{2|\beta|}
| |
− | \\
| |
− | &=& \frac{a\beta^* + a^\dagger \beta}{2|\beta|}
| |
− | \\
| |
− | &=& \frac{a e^{-i\theta} + a^\dagger e^{i\theta}}{2}
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | \end{array}</math>
| |
− | Two important values of this signal are
| |
− | :<math>\begin{array}{rcl}
| |
− | \mbox{for} ~~ \theta=0 ~~&:&~~ X_\theta = \frac{a+ a^\dagger }{2} = x
| |
− | \\
| |
− | ~~~~~ \theta=\frac{\pi}{2} ~~&:&~~ X_\theta = \frac{a- a^\dagger }{2i} = p
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | \end{array}</math>
| |
− | This thus shows how a beamsplitter and a strong coherent state input
| |
− | source can be used to experimentally measure <math>x</math> and <math>p</math> quadratures
| |
− | of a light field.
| |
− | The technique just described uses a 50/50 beamsplitter, and is known
| |
− | as "balanced homodyne" detection.
| |
− | A similar technique, using an unblanced beamsplitter, say one with
| |
− | <math>99\%</math> transmission of the <math>a</math> mode, is known as "unbalanced
| |
− | homodyne" mixing, and useful for a different purpose. Consider this setup:
| |
− | ::[[Image:chapter2-quantum-light-part-2-lect5-unbal-hom.png|thumb|204px|none|]]
| |
− | The output port operator for <math>a_0</math> may be expressed as
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | a_0 = T a - \sqrt{1-T^2} b
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | Now let a strong coherent state <math>|\beta{\rangle}</math> be input to port <math>b</math>, such
| |
− | that to good approximation, in the limit that <math>T\approx 1</math>, we may write
| |
− | :<math>\begin{array}{rcl}
| |
− | a_0 &\approx& T a - \sqrt{1-T^2} \beta
| |
− | \\
| |
− | &\approx& T ( a - \sqrt{1-T^2} \beta )
| |
− | \\
| |
− | &\approx& D(\sqrt{1-T^2} \beta ) a D(\sqrt{1-T^2} \beta )^\dagger
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | \end{array}</math>
| |
− | Unbalanced homodyne mixing thus allows approximation experimental
| |
− | implementation of a displacement operation.
| |
− | === Teleportation of light ===
| |
− | We conclude this section with an exploration of an exotic application
| |
− | of squeezed states: the teleportation of a quantum state of light. In
| |
− | order to clearly convey the basic concepts, this treatment will
| |
− | emphasize empirical understanding, above mathematical rigor.
| |
− | So far, we have limited ourselves to studying a single mode of light.
| |
− | It is not hard to see, however, that two-mode squeezed states are also
| |
− | possible, and that for example, straightforward generalization of the
| |
− | squeezing operator <math>S(r)</math> from Eq.(\ref{eq:c2-sdef}) to two modes gives
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | \exp \left[ { -\frac{r}{2}(a_1a_2 - a^\dagger _1 a^\dagger _2) } \right] |0 \rangle _1|0 \rangle _2
| |
− | = \frac{1}{\cosh r}\sum_n \tanh^n r |n \rangle _1|n \rangle _2
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | This state can also be expressed as a superposition of coherent
| |
− | states, of the form
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | \int d\alpha\; |\alpha{\rangle}|\alpha{\rangle}
| |
− | \,,
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | and given that momentum and position eigenstates can be expressed as
| |
− | infinite superpositions of coherent states, as in
| |
− | Eqs.(\ref{eq:c2-mstate}-\ref{eq:c2-pstate}), it is reasonable to believe
| |
− | that such an infinitely-squeezed two-mode state could be expressed (in
| |
− | unnormalized form) as
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | \int dx\; |x{\rangle}|x{\rangle}
| |
− | \,,
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | where <math>|x{\rangle}</math> represents a position basis state.
| |
− | Let us begin with such an infinitely-squeezed two-mode state, and show
| |
− | how a state of light can be teleported. In the following, state
| |
− | vectors <math>|x \rangle _k</math> and <math>|y \rangle _k</math> will denote position basis states,
| |
− | <math>|p \rangle _k</math> will denote a momentum basis state, and the subscript <math>k</math>
| |
− | will deliniate the mode. Three modes will be involved. Overall
| |
− | normalization factors will be neglected.
| |
− | The setup is as follows:
| |
− | ::[[Image:chapter2-quantum-light-part-2-lect5-teleportation.png|thumb|200px|none|]]
| |
− | \noindent
| |
− | where the initial state begins at the top of the diagram, and time
| |
− | evolves downward. Modes <math>2</math> and <math>3</math> contain the squeezed state, and
| |
− | an unknown quantum state
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\psi \rangle = \int dx\; f(x) |x \rangle _1
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | is input. The main idea is that modes <math>1</math> and <math>2</math> belong to one
| |
− | person (call her "Alice"), and mode <math>3</math> belongs to another person
| |
− | ("Bob"). Alice and Bob jointly share the two-mode squeezed state,
| |
− | which was distributed to them long before <math>|\psi{\rangle}</math> came into
| |
− | existence. Only Alice has <math>|\psi{\rangle}</math>, and she would like to
| |
− | communicate it to Bob, but the quantum link is down, and all she can
| |
− | do is to mail him a classical message. Normally, this would be
| |
− | impossible, but, because they have the pre-shared two-mode squeezed
| |
− | state, they can use it to communicate <math>|\psi{\rangle}</math>, following this procedure.
| |
− | The initial state of the three modes is
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\phi_0 \rangle = \int\int dx\; dy\; f(x) |x \rangle _1 |y \rangle _2 |y \rangle _3
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | The first two modes are now sent through a beamsplitter, resulting in
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\phi_1 \rangle = \int\int dx\; dy\; f(x)
| |
− | \left | \frac{x-y}{\sqrt{2}} \right \rangle _1
| |
− | \left | \frac{x+y}{\sqrt{2}} \right \rangle _2
| |
− | |y \rangle _3
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | Recall that position eigenstates may be expressed as weighted sums
| |
− | over momentum eigenstates, as
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |x \rangle = \int dp\; e^{ixp} |p{\rangle}
| |
− | \,,
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | so that <math>|\phi_1{\rangle}</math> may be equivalently expressed as
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\phi_1 \rangle = \int\int\int dx\; dy\; dp\; f(x)
| |
− | e^{i(x+y)p/\sqrt{2}}
| |
− | \left | \frac{x-y}{\sqrt{2}} \right \rangle _1
| |
− | \left | p \right \rangle _2
| |
− | |y \rangle _3
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | Alice now measures the photons in her two modes; she performs a
| |
− | homodyne <math>x</math>-measurement of mode <math>1</math>, and a <math>p</math>-measurement of mode
| |
− | <math>2</math>. Let <math>x_1</math> and <math>p_2</math> be her measurement results. The
| |
− | post-measurement state <math>|\phi_2{\rangle}</math> is
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\phi_2 \rangle = \int dy\; f(y+\sqrt{2}x_1)
| |
− | e^{i(\sqrt{2}x_1+2y)p_2/\sqrt{2}}
| |
− | |y \rangle _3
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | Changing variables from <math>y</math> to <math>z = y+\sqrt{2}x_1</math>, this becomes
| |
− | :<math>
| |
− | |\phi_2 \rangle = e^{ix_1 p_2} \int dz\; f(z)
| |
− | e^{i(z-\sqrt{2}x_1)\sqrt{2} p_2}
| |
− | |z-\sqrt{2}x_1 \rangle _3
| |
− | \,,
| |
− | </math>
| |
− | which is just a displaced version of the original state, up to an
| |
− | irrelevant overall phase:
| |
− | :<math>\begin{array}{rcl}
| |
− | |\phi_2 \rangle &=& e^{ix_1p_2} \int dz\; f(z) D(\sqrt{2}x_1
| |
− | e^{i\sqrt{2}p_2}) |z{\rangle}
| |
− | \\
| |
− | &=& e^{ix_1p_2} D(\sqrt{2}x_1 e^{i\sqrt{2}p_2}) |\psi{\rangle}
| |
− | \,.
| |
− | \end{array}</math>
| |
− | Thus, if Alice sends Bob her measurement results <math>x_1</math> and <math>p_1</math>, then
| |
− | he can reconstruct <math>|\psi{\rangle}</math> by applying the displacement
| |
− | <math>D(\sqrt{2}x_1 e^{i\sqrt{2}p_2})</math> using an unbalanced homodyne operation.
| |
− | The elegance of this version of quantum teleportation is in its
| |
− | experimental implementation: given the two-mode squeezed state,
| |
− | everything else in the protocol is experimentally straightforward.
| |
− | Indeed, this is why the above procedure has been experimentally
| |
− | implemented. Go read about it: Furusawa et al, Science vol. 282,
| |
− | p.706, 1998.
| |
Non-classical light
One of the most special properties of the coherent state is that its
fluctuations in and are equal, and minimal, meaning that it
satisfies the Heisenberg limit .
However, satisfying this limit does not require equal noise in the two
conjugate variables; it is certainly permissible for noise in one to
be larger than the other. Such states can, in principle, be quite
useful, for example, if a measurement only involves , and excess
noise in can be disregarded. In this section, we define such
squeezed states, and explore their physical properties. We
begin with classical squeezing, then define squeezed states of a
quantum simple harmonic oscillator, describe how squeezing can be
experimentally detected, then show how it can be useful in a quantum
experiment: teleportation.
Classical squeezing
We are interested in the dynamics of the simple harmonic oscillator,
and it is useful to obtain some intuition about what is possible from
considering the classical oscillator. Consider a particle in the
potential
The equations of motion for this particle,
have the solution
where , , and are constant. This motion is circular:
Suppose a small, "parametric" driving force is added, analogous to
kicking while on a swing. For a swinging pendulum, this force could
be applied by tugging gently up and down on the string as the pendulum
oscillates back and forth. Let this force be applied at twice
the frequency of the natural harmonic motion, such that the potential
becomes
where is small.
substituting
Eq.(\ref{eq:c2-ansatz}) into the equation of motion
approximating , and averaging away
terms rapidly oscillating at , we obtain new approximate
equations of motion
with solutions
This shows that the circular motion in phase space evolves under the
parametric drive to become elliptical:
What is the ultimate limit of this classical squeezing effect? The
answer turns out to be quantum noise, which enforces the Heisenberg
uncertainty limit, .
Squeezed states: quantum
A quantum simple harmonic oscillator excited by a parametric drive at
will also generate squeezed states. Physically, such a
process corresponds to a "nonlinear" interaction which involves
photons interacting with each other, via the medium they are
transported through or generated from.
One important physical process that generates squeezed states of light
is known as the optical parametric oscillator, which we may think of
as being an atomic system that is driven at , and produces
two photons at and , due to cascaded decay from
two equaly spaced energy levels:
Such a process can be described by the Hamiltonian
where acts on the output mode at frequency , and
the input mode, at frequency . If the input light is a
strong coherent field, then to a good approximation, we may replace
and by a classical variable in this Hamiltonian, obtaining
where denotes the strength of the input pump light, and for
simplicity, we fix in the following.
Motivated by this Hamiltonian for the optical parametric oscillator,
we may define a mathematical operator which produces squeezed states:
Note that the operator in the exponent has the form , where is
Hermitian, so is manifestly a unitary transform.
What does do? A useful mathematical technique for dealing with
is to understand how it transforms operators in the Heisenberg
picture. For example,
Let us use
as dimensionless Hermitean operators for position and momentum. Under
the squeezing operator, using the above expansion, it is
straightforward to show that position and momentum transform to
become:
This shows that squeezes noise from the position, and adds
noise to the momentum, of a harmonic oscillator state. Consider, for
example, the effect of this operator on the vauum state, ,
which we call the "squeezed vacuum" state. The plot of
this squeezed vacuum is:
\noindent
Note that since is unitary, it leaves
invariant, so is a minumim uncertainty state, since is.
We can explicitly compute what is as follows:
Note that this state only has nonzero probability amplitude to have an
even number of photons!
Another usful representation for the squeezed vacuum is in terms of
coherent states:
This representation allows us to depict useful limits, such as when
, the inifinite squeezing limit, giving a state we
may call :
and similarly, we may define
These two states have plots which are of infinite extent,
horizontally (for ) and vertically (for ), indicating that
infinitely squeezed states are position and momentum eigenstates:
How can squeezing produce finite valued position and momentum
eigenstates? Physically, a simple harmonic oscillator such as an
oscillating pendulum is given a finite momentum or position by
displacing the pendulum, and the same is done to produce squeezed
states of and .
We define the mathematical displacement operator as
It is straightforward to show (by expanding the exponential, for
example), that this operator has the property that
such that the displaced vacuum state satisfies
Since is thus an eigenstate of , it must be the case
that . The displacement operator displaces
the vacuum state to become a coherent state :
Using the displacement operator, squeezed states with finite momentum
and position can thus be described, for example, by
. What do these states look like, both in the
representation, as well as their electric field? Recall
that the vacuum, coherent state, and number states look as follows:
A displaced, partially squeezed state, a near-position eigenstate, and
a near-momentum eigenstate correspondingly look like this:
Note how the squeezed states attain electric fields which are, at
times, very low in either amplitude or phase uncertainty. By
employing these states in the right kind of interferometer, as we
shall see later, this reduced noise level can be used to improve the
precision of certain measurements.
Homodyne detection
How can we experimentally detect if a state is squeezed? Ideally,
squeezing could be detected by measuring the noise level in and
. However, photodetectors are square-law detectors which sense
light intensity, meaning photon number, and not quadrature field
components.
Nevertheless, the and field components can be detected if the
input light is first transformed by beating it with a reference
signal of fixed phase. Intuitively, this follows the principle upon
which many early radios worked: by mixing a signal with a reference oscillator , the cosine and sine components
and can be picked out. This method is known as homodyne
detection, because it involves mixing with a reference at the same
frequency as the signal.
With radio frequency signals, a diode is used to mix signal and
reference; the nonlinearity of the diode produces an output which is
to first order, the product of the signal and reference.
Mixing of light frequency signals is done with a beamsplitter.
Consider a 50/50 beamsplitter with the signal input into port , and
the reference into port , and detectors placed at the two outputs:
The beamsplitter mixes the two input ports, performing a unitary
transform that relates the output port operators and
to the input port operators and ,
- <math>\begin{array}{rcl}
a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagger = \frac{a+b}{\sqrt{2}}
\\
a_0 &=& U_{bs} a U_{bs}^\dagg